Home Rene Lourau Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Stock Image. Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Edition). QR code for Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Title, Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Contributor, René Lourau. Publisher, Nueva Imagen, Tercera, el cambio institucional ha sido no sólo continuo, sino inusualmente dicha teoría considera al individuo como la unidad básica de análisis y, por el otro, . “elemento objetivo del sistema jurídico” de Hauriou (Lourau, 9, 62).
|Published (Last):||8 August 2018|
|PDF File Size:||18.15 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.70 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Paradoxes between the analysis and the criticism. In the tutelary council it is usual to take as true the version that presents itself in the first moment.
Analyzing each perception, shuddering truths, is a bet in the understanding of the logics that sustains the practices read by our gaze, before judging their truth or qualifying the agreements. When a mother is judged by both the school staff and the tutelary council for not being in time to lougau up her children because she stayed home watching television, a certainty is given: The author as a protagonist. It puts on the scene everything and everyone who in writing emerges as instituvional, summoning them to contribute to the analysis through their speeches, practices or the bonds that the problematizations create.
Criticism carries an intention of correction and adaptation.
Thus, to define a situation as a fact, to register it and to approach it in a certain way, all this is part of a certain historically constructed subjective production that intsitucional the field of the political.
In it, the professional doing is rebuilt not by accusations of failure, but by possible displacements in the exercise of collective thinking. Socioanalytic loufau as an internship practice. That is, social fact has coercive functions on individual initiatives, because it is outside people’s consciousness, according to “a set of rules and determining what is right or wrong, allowed or prohibited”p. No models to follow?
Books by Rene Lourau
It is up to the socioanalytic intervention to conduct the analysis process, making sure that the displacements detach themselves from the identity perspective. When discussing the written and oral records of practices in the intervention fields during the internship supervisions, it is difficult for those who narrate their experiences to depart from the logic of judgment, since the debate that institucionao built up in the collective may suggest that the performance in the presented event could have been in many other ajalisis.
It is not a matter of recording successes, mistakes and deviations, in a proposal of self-criticism, but of thinking that every practice is a production to be thought of not as an inevitable act, nor an act to be corrected, but as an event that occurs in an enchainment of meanings. Writing a diary is recording an experience that is reminiscent when thinking about what happened, the forces that went through an event, knstitucional affects that made certain scenes become invisible, and others to stand loirau with understandings and emphases that did analisid necessarily arise in the moment they were lived.
Socioanalytic intervention as an internship practice For almost twenty years we have been supervising internships in three distinct fields: Compulsory schooling, the ways in which relationships are established in this family, the imposition by the school of family tasks as a condition for the performance of pedagogical activities Interrogations are the right tool of a field diary, the good company in a formation by keeping alive the thinking and the research as professional practices that do not exhaust and do not cease to make learning.
Análisis institucional y socioanálisis – Google Books
Namely, it is usually the first interview, the first contact, the speech of the first attended in each case that holds true as the story that has real force. To follow the course of the analyses, we take a powerful auxiliary: Intervention that is not given as an adjustment of the diary’s author in the professional practice his and his colleagues’but as a movement to think the fundamentals that led the practices: For example, intervening in a tutelary council implies thinking about the actions that take place in the encounter with the different forces, relationships and beliefs that build this territory.
The author as a protagonist The writing of a field diary from the perspective of institutional analysis is a collective practice, even when it is authorial. Paradoxes between the analysis and the criticism The field diary is a technical instrument that produces an intervention in the reality in question by problematizing both what is called analysis and how it should be done.
The analysis, analksis is based on the socio-analytical references, analisie an exercise of thinking about the problems, the implications, understanding how they constitute us and lead our action.
Among them, the one taken as an archaeological meaning can help to think the work with the field diary, because it aims at the traces of historical and discursive novelties that seek the regularity of practices, distancing themselves from the concept of social fact – as proposed by Durkheim. Collective because it is the processes that constitute us, that anxlisis present and drive the perceptions fixed on paper.
As discussed by Coimbra and Nascimento”the implications analysis brings to the field of analysis feelings, perceptions, actions, events hitherto considered negative or strange, as deviations and errors Therefore, the implication analysis is a permanent process of denaturalization of institutions. In Durkheim’s words, “Every way of doing is a social fact, whether fixed or not, which can exert an external coercion on the individual, or which is general in the set of a given society having at the same time an own existence, independent of its individual manifestations”p.
A creative dimension leads the diary and that, just before giving security, can scare. For this purpose, it operates with its own tools, among them the implication analysis and the field diary.
Far from the determinism of judging such meanings, they are the louraau that become the object of analysis and not the singular acts. Therefore, it is possible to say that the writing of the diary is the analytical reading of practice, since writing allows events, which could be ignored, to take shape and have a meaning for the analysis.
The field diary is a technical instrument that produces an intervention in the reality in question by problematizing both what is called analysis and how it should be done.
Referring him to the school principal, which led to his suspension, had as an answer the boy’s analisi through the weapons he also had at institudional Thus, when intervening in the tutelary council it is necessary to think of it as an institution that has a history and movements that escape the boundaries of the place and the space-time condition of the establishment. An important tool for carrying out the implication analysis is the field diary, which operates as a narrative of day-to-day intervention, historicizing it, rescuing it, potentializing it, in other words, enabling analysis by the act of writing.
Under such analisls perspective it would be institucinal the analyst to come to the fact, to recognize it, to register it, and then study it, as a body exposed in a laboratory. The contents of the field diary could never be defined a priorinor could a schema or guideline be established, since this would be a pretension to guide the way of seeing, feeling, thinking, affecting, to signify the relationships at stake. From this perspective, writing a field diary is to construct reality by a certain discursive order and not a simple act of technical reproduction.
The event emerges from the encounter between the references that constitute the subject and the ones in which our intervention is objectified. However, it was in the diary’s writing that the predictable lost focus, disrupting the normalized places.
In this abyss the diary projects us when converted into an apprenticeship committed to thinking and feeling. It could have been another way because we did not work with technical instructions, manuals of procedures, verifiable truths, but with relationships immersed in valued spontaneities and put into analysis in their implications. From this perspective, the exercise of writing problematizes how we affect ourselves, our strangeness and difficulties, allowing institucoonal to stir up the instituted.
The analysis is done to understand lourak the fact was produced and why, as a universal reality, to coerce those who are submitted to it. Amid the numerous considerations built up ana,isis a group education policies, pedagogical training, the established relationship with the class, the singularity that crosses analisid norms, the affective bonds, the differences in relation to the administrative procedures have been reworking the lived scene and bringing virtualities.
The lived experience that composes the writing does not necessarily match the one that occurred originally, because the thinking and feeling in the moment in which a record is constructed allows to resign, in an analytical compass in which the author is not alone, iinstitucional in a shared movement with all those who composed the scene and in the midst of their thoughts, feelings, values, instituckonal, also put into question.