14 jun. OSM. RV Fonte: Pensa. Estácio – Apostila de Organização, Sistemas e Métodos. Mundo das Marcas: football strategy OSM. and have my say about how OSM engine should work in my opinion to make OSM better game . APOSTILA OSM (1). OSM for Data Preparedness in Indonesia State of OSM Indonesia: Disaster Preparedness and Community Growth Yantisa Akhadi â @hotosm. org.
|Published (Last):||17 April 2011|
|PDF File Size:||17.62 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.50 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It should be successful against formations with less men in midfield such as, etc. Thus, it should be only deployed if those 3 midfielders are world class.
We Need Your Support. Now I’ll generally comment on all available tactics: There are teams which play attacking with long balls to reach high number of attackers such as, or But it could also be deployed with defensive tactics and formations, for teams which play direct football and try to reach final third as quickly as possible.
If attackers are good, this formation could dominate formations with smaller or equal number of defenders,,all resulting in high scoring games. The accuracy and whether it will get a draw or even win should depend on quality of goalkeeper, defence and attacker if he is able to convert those rare chances to goal. We are always happy to assist you. It should be really good against any 3 or men defences if it can afford good attackers.
It should work only with attacking long ball and thats it. It should also be deployed with long ball or counter attack and count to get a draw against better opponent and even a win if attackers are good enough.
There are still 3 central aposstila, 4 at the back and one real CF. When playing against attacking tactics and formations, aposgila should almost always have worse stats. Currently SOS works the best with defensive formations and when playing defensive you should not have that many shots on goal and better possession because you sit back and invite pressure from the opponent who dictates the tempo.
OK folks, here it is It could also dominate any 3-men defence and also concede less goals because of strong defence on its own. The quality of attackers is the most important.
This way team wont have many chances to shoot from reasonable distance and position, it must quickly counter and build up such position and not just shoots from 50 meters. First I’m going to suggest what tactics should be defensive and offensive generally and then I’ll comment on all available formations and what tactics should work with them.
No team rally solely on desperately shoot on goal from all positions. It could work well against formations with weaker midfield,where it could dominate possession. Even defensive teams must play direct football and try to reach reasonable distance to shoot playing on the counter, long ball or even play wide which is again counterattacking.
It could do well against weak midfield such as or since it has advantage in defence and midfield area. But it can such againstor which could dominate both midfield and defence areas.
OSM Interface Development Approach
But it has better midfield and could also do well against formations with 4 or 3 midfielders and apostlia attackers such odm and It shouldnt also do well against because its 4vs4 and in midfield but also attackers will have tough time to score against 5 defenders.
To have a chance to shot you should pass the ball at first place. It could even work with with best teams with really strong midfield and attack see Barcelona, Real, Dortmund, Bayern in real life.
What Stefan wrote below deserves GB’s serious consideration in my view as oxm for the good of the game and benefits everyone. Clenilson Osm 3p Adm. Strong teams only should be successful with SOS tactics because they have attacking potential to create shots on goal and score.
OSM Interface Development Approach – [PPTX Powerpoint]
The problem with this formation is when it faces attacking formations with only 3 defenders, such as or where its outnumbered in midfield and would see very little of the ball. Three midfielders should help defence and provide those balls to the wings. Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. Osm Course Quality Rubric. In order to be broken, attackers must be quality and clinical psm order to score against 6 midfielders. We are nonprofit website to share apostioa download documents.
OSM by Ricardo Vieira on Prezi
All materials on our website are shared by users. Offensive apstila should be: If playing attacking, like in Dutch football, teams utilize on their full backs, wingers and attacker in the box who should convert those chances.
SOS should work with attacking formations which attempt to score and not sit back. It has balanced defence, strong midfield and weak attack. It should almost always generate high scoring games because of many attackers and weak defence. And its bad choice against or because lone attacker will have tough time to score against that many defenders. Obviously I couldn’t cover all possible combinations but if at least some of my thoughts influence Gamebasics to improve the match engine I would be very happy.