The Transfiguration of the Commonplace banal tan chemtone applied casually with a roller. ARTHUR C. DANTO is professor of philosophy at Co-. Buy LA TRANSFIGURATION DU BANAL. Une philosophie de l’art by Arthur-C Danto (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices. LA TRANSFIGURATION DU BANAL. Une philosophie de l’art by Arthur-C Danto at – ISBN – ISBN – Seuil.
|Country:||Central African Republic|
|Published (Last):||21 September 2010|
|PDF File Size:||2.29 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.39 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Books by Arthur C.
Dan McKeaney rated it really liked it Jul 09, These examples nicely make the point that an art bznal is what it is because of the traditions surrounding it, what the world was like around it, all this knowledge building to our attitude toward it. Write a customer review. Return to Book Page. Would you like to tell us about a lower price? It is not just, as is so often said, that metaphors go stale; they go dead in a way that sometimes require scholarly resurrection.
To ask other readers questions about The Transfiguration of the Commonplaceplease sign up.
The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art
Anyone who wants to put the work into learning the language of art shares in its power. Anyway, whether you agree or disagree with Danto, his discussions of what makes art, art are smart and comprehensive. Any book that makes you want to make is a good one. Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life. A younger person might have to employ a bit of research to nail down those analogies, but it would be worth the effort.
La transfiguration du banal: Arthur Danto: : Books
His interests span thought, feeling, philosophy of art, theories of representation, philosophical psychology, Hegel’s aesthetics, and the philosophers Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Arthur Schopenhauer. While some of his contemporary examples humorous and relevant are dated, heavily using s and s pop culture and artworld commentary and examples When he stands in front of an object, he is beginning to be able to choose which language to use; another rtansfiguration to say it, whether to use an aesthetic attitude or an everyday attitude.
If we carry this example far enough, it trnsfiguration no difference at all. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
In order for the viewer to grasp the artistic intention behind the art work, the viewer must know or come to understand the meanings that the artist infused into the work. Titians, battle scenes, Hudson River School waterfalls.
This makes it ppossible, for example, that many feminists were produced by absorbing male bnaal literature. I think his theory leaves a lot to be desired, and has several holes.
The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art by Arthur C. Danto
Be the first to ask a question about The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. I think my reading order of danto may have been the reason for my not enjoying this book as much.
This way of representing whatever he does represent is what I have in mind by style. He is talking about the differences between worlds rather than institutions and might be summarized with a point made by Wittgenstein: And it’s peppered with small funny little observations, like when people mistake describing a painting for a value judgement on it sure that story is dark, brooding, and ominous, but is it good?
Manufacturer warranty may not apply Learn more about Amazon Global Store.
He would say that anything that was ever considered art was embedded in the viewpoints and possibilities of its time: It has some very interesting arguments about the questions of imitation in art or the cognitive power of the work of art. If the categories are finally different, they are also procedurally nested in one another. Although thin, this one is hefty In the course of constructing such a theory, he seeks transfiguratioon demonstrate the relationship between philosophy and art Arthur C.
Bnal copy is now peppered with post-it flags. It does not depend on talents or any other gift but the ability to learn.
Danto argues that recent developments in the art world, in particular the production of works of art that cannot be told from ordinary things, make urgent the need for a new theory of art and make plain the factors such a theory can and cannot involve.
Danto spends his time here with the question of what sets an ordinary object apart from what we generally describe as art. Certainly, the two books share many basic premises, the autonomy of art from everyday discourse being the most basic.