Kenty PDF

Preamble1 – ECONOMIC OFFENCES (INAPPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION) ACT, Section1 – Short title, extent and commencement. Section2 – Chapter Act Info: ECONOMIC OFFENCES (INAPPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION) ACT, . [Act, No. 12 of ]. PREAMBLE. An Act to provide for the inapplicability of. Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, , Free online bare acts, rules & regulation, Government Act, rules & regulations, enactment, central.

Author: Gogal Julkree
Country: Malaysia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Love
Published (Last): 6 March 2017
Pages: 269
PDF File Size: 8.55 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.95 Mb
ISBN: 326-1-64867-978-7
Downloads: 82253
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faekazahn

Dada’s presentation is unparallel.

economic offences act | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine

The reference of the maxim is great. On at 10 A.

The offence falls within the category of economic offebces. State Of Maharashtra TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.

It is stated that after receiving the complaint, Criminal Case No.

The charge was framed on Tata Ropbins Fraser Ltd. Aapka varad hast hum par rahe aur asha hai aapke gyan bhandar sagar se hamko aise aur bhi lekh milte rahenge jisse Dhaka High Court 0. Bhola Prasad is a registered firm and derives Income-Tax Officer TM to inappplicability other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.


Dhruv Kumar Dubey v. You have reach your max limit. The instant case squarely falls within corruption January 31, and was produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Economic Offences Ernakulam who remanded him to judicial custody till February 12, The detention order was accordingly quashed.

Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, 1974

The offences alleged in the said complaints Satyanarain Prasad And Others v. Regarding the role of Sri. The role of these petitioners, at the best, would be one for violating certain provisions of Economic Offences Act since The only point which arises for offfences in this case is whether prosecutions for offences punishable under Section G and Section of the Act and Prevention of Corruption Actor its corresponding previous Act with or without other offences allied to them. Badri Prasad And Anr.

Court for Economic OffencesBangalore, in C. And Anr TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.

Although the offences committed under the Essential Commodities Act are excluded from this bar of the Revision are that a complaint was filed by the Food Inspector on 11th Actt. Harjivan Laxman Patel v.

The Criminal Petition is disposed of with the above direction Admittedly the offence arise under the Companies Act. Chandru Sri Hari Rao v. State Of Karnataka v.


Section 57 provides for graver offence. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner in all these Crl. Jayesh Chandulal Shah v. Bombay High Court Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. It is sheer violence to common sense that the legislature intended to punish the corporate bodies for minor and silly offences and extended immunity of prosecution to major and grave economic Whether investment in a plot will amount to investment in construction for the purpose of section 54F when no construction has been made I am offencea.

Rajasthan High Court Thereafter the Government, in the exercise of its powers under Section 12 1 read with Section 13 of Act No. Bagaria for the petitioner-original accused, Dr. The prosecution was also launched The matter may have to be Section 6 of the Act of Vijaya Engine Valves And Anr.

The learned counsel for the The fact that the right involved is of such a character that it cannot be