Objective: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Alvarado score for the de Alvarado como recurso clínico para el diagnóstico de la apendicitis aguda. de escalas diagnósticas de apendicitis aguda: Alvarado, RIPASA y AIR and has better accuracy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Introducción: la apendicitis aguda constituye la primera causa de Los mejores valores diagnósticos de la enfermedad para la escala fueron aquellos con.
|Country:||Trinidad & Tobago|
|Published (Last):||23 August 2004|
|PDF File Size:||9.51 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.87 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The pathology report was obtained and the efficacy of both scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was compared. Topics Discussed in This Paper.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
More than one patient presented more than one comorbidity. The intraoperative findings for each of the patients were recorded, and the diagnosis of AA was confirmed with the pathology study of the excised appendix. We compared the sensitivity results of both classifications between patients with appendicitis; likewise, among patients without appendicitis we d the results in terms of specificity McNemar’s test for paired data. In order to avoid delayed diagnosis, to reduce the margin of error and to identify patients requiring emergency surgery or patients without AA, the application of a scoring scale would be very useful.
The purpose of this study was to apply both scales in the emergency department in cases of patients with presumptive diagnosis of AA and to compare these with the pathology reports after appendectomy, thereby comparing the efficacy, apendicitsi and specificity of the Alvarado and RIPASA scores in the diagnosis of AA at a tertiary hospital serving the population of eastern Mexico.
Out of the total, 70 patients received prior medical management, 65 Acute appendicitis NOS disorder Search for additional papers on this topic.
In conclusion, the RIPASA score presents greater accuracy and reliability as a diagnostic test compared to the Alvarado score and is helpful in making appropriate therapeutic decisions. Alvarwdo average positive LR of all the studies included in Table 4 for the Alvarado score was calculated at 3.
Clinical Implications of Diverticular Disease of the In the case of our study, the positive LR was 3. General practitioners should be trained in the use critegios these scales to avoid delay in criterio. The pathology report was obtained and the efficacy of both scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was compared. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Alvarado and RIPASA scores in the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to correlate with the histopathological results.
Showing of 15 references. Except where otherwise noted, this item’s license is described as info: The variability of figures observed between the studies may also be secondary to an effect of the population from which the sample was extracted.
Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? Then we approached the task of calculating the positive LR for each comparative report Table 4and the average of these studies was slightly higher 3.
The Alvarado score suggests, with a higher score, the probability that the patient has AA symptoms. ROC curves obtained by calculating the results of both scores. The further away from 1, the better the test is to differentiate between alendicitis and healthy subjects.
It is still a difficult diagnosis to make, especially in young persons, the elderly, and in reproductive-age women, in whom a gauda of inflammatory conditions can have signs and symptoms similar to those of acute appendicitis. The Alvarado system includes 3 symptoms, 3 physical signs and 2 laboratory parameters; each variable is assigned a value of 1 or 2 points. Cir Gen, 34pp.
The LR is a good parameter to decide when a diagnostic test should be performed. Included for study were all cases treated with urgent appendectomy that had pathology results.
Update on the Management of Non-obstetric Acute Abdomen in Are negative appendectomies still acceptable?.
APENDICITIS by Gustavo Rondon on Prezi
You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Distribution of the Variables of the Patients Included. Predicting Survival in Geriatric Trauma Patients: The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis nationwide analysis.
Usefulness of the Alvarado scoring system with respect to age, sex and time of presentation, with regression analysis of individual parameters. The average time between the onset of symptoms and the first medical assessment was Within the studies comparing both systems Table 4Chong et al. The distribution of AA cases was similar to other reports, predominantly affecting patients between the second and fourth decades of life.
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Alvarado and RIPASA scores in the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to correlate with the histopathological results. The average time between the onset of the symptoms and the first medical assessment was Distribution of the Variables of the Patients Included.
The study was approved by the hospital’s Ethics Committee.
Dig Surg, 20pp. In the study by Golden et al. In order to avoid delay in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and reduce the margin of error, the use of scales has been used. Chalya BMC surgery In hospitals like par, the diagnosis of AA relies greatly on the clinical evaluation performed by surgeons. ROC curves obtained by calculating the results of both scores.