By Deborah Tannen Random Fighting for Our Lives Conflict can’t be avoided in our public lives any more than we can avoid conflict with people we love. Used to express ideas; Talk about everything as if it were a war; “take a shot at it”; “I don’t want to be shot down”; train us to think about & see. Deborah Tannen Fighting for Our , Sep 21, pm, PDF Document (application/pdf), KB, dy.
|Published (Last):||4 May 2008|
|PDF File Size:||5.32 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.29 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
To emphasize this point, Tannen refers to a scientific study in which participants viewed a video of two cars colliding. Find an Independent Bookseller Near You. This is just one of the many relevant examples Tannen utilized in her writing to illustrate her views.
Talking from 9 to 5. Our society has become overwhelmingly adversarial, with consequences not only in our ability to solve problems but also in our personal relationships. She relates the ineffectiveness of the typical spousal arguments to the tactics utilized in headlining public discourse. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here In this article, Deborah Tannen attempts to open the eyes of the reader to the argumentative culture to which we have all become accustomed to.
I had hoped Tannen would have emphasized some alternative vighting methods to the current ones of which she finds so unappealing. The latter group recalled the cars moving at much higher speeds than the first group, illustrating the power and influence words can have on perception. Fightong explains that though dwborah method has its rightful place; it is ineffective and dangerous to employ it for every situation.
Response to Deborah Tannen’s essay: The Argument Culture
You Were Always Mom’s Favorite! It also encourages people to look for irrelevant rhetorical weaknesses in the opposing argument, rather than listening to the important matters at hand.
You are commenting using your Facebook account. When asked a question pertaining to the most frequent inquiries by clients, Tannen stated that it was regarding the different conversational styles of men and women. While the reader is susceptible to criticizing the validity of this very writing through labeling Tannen a social skeptic, she does conclude the work with various alternate methods to this solution.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Since community is a blend of connections and authorities, both of which are deteriorating from this adversarial attitude, alienation then forms, and the trend spirals communities into states of detachment and hostility. Video Lectures for Classroom Use.
In this light, I feel she also offered her weakest example of her said point. She has observed that, while conflict and opposition are needed in a dialogue just as much as cooperation and agreement, the scale has been tipped, with conflict and opposition being overweighed. Hi, this is a comment. I feel a stronger example could have been used to emphasize the thought differences between men and women. In our culture, deborh every topic is emphasized as a battle or argument in which there are definite atnnen and losers.
Notify me of new comments via email.
This book oives change forever how you see forces that powerfully shape our lives, and suggests new ways of reaching our goals.
Thank you Kristine Houston. I liked how you kept the response clear because her paper discussed so many different contributing factors and results that it would be easy to lose focus of the main point. But, like everything in life, moderation must be applied for the tool of debate.
Tannen traces this tendency to the history of our drborah system, and shows its roots among boys at play. Email required Address never made public. Interestingly, despite her efforts I found her writing quite aggressive and argumentative itself.
The war on drugs, the battle of the sexes, politicians’ turf battles—war metaphors pervade our talk and shape our thinking, urging us to approach anything we need to accomplish as a fight deboraj two opposing sides. She highlights how tanjen has become programmed to pursue truth by the assumption that each issue has two opposing sides. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.
Fighting for Our Lives by Miranda Reyna on Prezi
She states that a reporter, upon interviewing her in regard to her new published book, misquoted her. Unfortunately, her sole offering is to experiment with metaphors other than sports and war, and to utilize expressive formats others than traditional debate style.
To find out more, including how to control deborzh, see here: You are commenting using your WordPress. Abridged Audio Version read by the author. Tannen goes on to list the repercussions of the previous observations, concerned that this increasing trend of opposition is attributed to the breakdown of our society. You are commenting using your Twitter account.
In her trademark clear, well-organized style, and generously using examples from her own life, Tannen moves from arena to arena, backing her thesis with plenty of research. Exploring how other cultures approach opposition, and discussing the influence of electronic communication in ratcheting up the level of aggression, Tannen shows how we can move toward more constructive dialogue in our public as well our private lives.
Tannen is concerned that our culture has become so accustomed to this habit of arguing that we have framed everything into a debate, in which winning or losing is the main concern. Log in No account?
She brought to light many instances of the automatic use of adversarial formats which we have grown to accept. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. You Just Don’t Understand. Okr reported her reply as the necessity to distinguish between biological or cultural styles. More on these will be interesting.