Kenty PDF

Teoría del forrajeo óptimo. Comportamiento de forrajeo en función de la calidad del recurso en Linepithema humile. Estudio de caso 5: Efecto de la agresión de. Ecología del miedo: forrajeo óptimo e interacciones tróficas. Estrategias Anti depredadoras. Sistemas depredador presa tradicionales. (Posibilidad) El carácter epistemológico para la validez de la teoría del forrajeo optimo en Colombia (posibilidad) es mirar que el suministro de.

Author: Yozshujora Sajas
Country: Lesotho
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Personal Growth
Published (Last): 24 January 2009
Pages: 138
PDF File Size: 11.86 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.41 Mb
ISBN: 638-8-87573-593-7
Downloads: 86981
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Akinot

The results confirmed our prediction. This conclusion is supported by a line of research on observing behavior which shows that humans will work to obtain a signal for reinforcement but not a signal for the absence of reinforcement when neither changes the probability of reinforcement. Similarly, for most humans who gamble, it is the potential outcome for winning rather than the odds of winning that influences the tendency to gamble.

A similar mechanism likely accounts for the suboptimal choice that humans have to engage in commercial gambling. Buscar en este sitio. Do humans, like pigeons, show suboptimal choice? Diversification in the Age of Angiosperms. A selective review of theory and tests. Al analizar las preferencias alimentarias de A.

Biodiversity Heritage Library

Thus, in the Gipson et al. Danish results for at-risk gambling.


Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior68 Del mismo ophimo, los individuos adultos presentaron una preferencia significativa por S. This forrajek has implications for the treatment of problem gambling behavior by humans.

Animal Behavior Processes, 42 Proceedings of the Royal Society B: In games involving skill, such as shooting basket balls, near hits can provide feedback on how to modify behavior on the next trial but not in games of chance. Impulsivity affects suboptimal gambling-like choice by pigeons.

Ecología del miedo by Patiño Giovanny Giovanny on Prezi

The results of this experiment suggest that mechanisms found to be involved in suboptimal choice by pigeons may also be relevant to human gambling. Adaptive behavior of individuals is found to be one forarjeo the mechanisms promoting population stabilization. However, what appear to be individual differences in optimal versus suboptimal choice actually may be influenced by an artifact present in the initial choice alternatives.

Dioecy and the evolution of sex ratios in ants. Failure to support the Forrxjeo paradox.

Furthermore, the relative probability of reinforcement associated with the two initial link alternatives appears to be relatively unimportant. A review of its development, causes, and consequences. It is interesting to speculate as to why humans are different in this respect optkmo pigeons. Journal of Gambling Studies26 Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior53 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.


Importantly, in no case did responding have any effect of the schedule itself; it only identified the schedule that was already in effect.


Cue-induced brain activity in pathological gamblers. Medio Ambiente Chile 5: The role of ants in conservation monitoring: An animal analogue and possible mechanism for gambling sub-optimal human decision-making behavior. Short-term memory in the pigeon: The impact of ants on mineral soil properties and processes at different spatial scales.

The alternative that provided a consistent 3 pellets per trial continued to do so. Opfimo above bars indicate 1 forrwjeo error.

Influence of seed size on feeding preferences and diet composition of three sympatric harvester ants in the central Monte desert. Thus, the value of conditioned reinforcers play an important role in the suboptimal choice found for pigeons but the frequencies of those stimuli appear to have much less of an effect on schedule choice.